<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1656 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289447</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the remand order and directed the first appellate authority to decide on merits and the jurisdiction of DRI Officers following a Delhi High Court decision. The judgment emphasized the importance of deciding cases on merits without waiting for final decisions from higher courts, allowing examination by the adjudicating authority or the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:43:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1656 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289447</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the remand order and directed the first appellate authority to decide on merits and the jurisdiction of DRI Officers following a Delhi High Court decision. The judgment emphasized the importance of deciding cases on merits without waiting for final decisions from higher courts, allowing examination by the adjudicating authority or the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>