https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289437 An adverse order affecting civil rights does not become operative until it is communicated to the person affected, unless a recognised exception applies. Applying that principle to dismissal from employment, the court held that the employment relationship could not be ended unilaterally without notice. Here, the dismissal order had been made earlier but was served only later, and no exception to the communication rule was shown. The dismissal therefore took effect only on service; by then, the Corporation was competent to proceed on reinstatement, and the State Government could not treat that resolution as an invalid reappointment. The annulment order was accordingly invalid. en-us Thu, 18 Sep 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Jul 2020 17:29:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289437 An adverse order affecting civil rights does not become operative until it is communicated to the person affected, unless a recognised exception applies. Applying that principle to dismissal from employment, the court held that the employment relationship could not be ended unilaterally without notice. Here, the dismissal order had been made earlier but was served only later, and no exception to the communication rule was shown. The dismissal therefore took effect only on service; by then, the Corporation was competent to proceed on reinstatement, and the State Government could not treat that resolution as an invalid reappointment. The annulment order was accordingly invalid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Sep 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289437