<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (12) TMI 338 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289436</link>
    <description>A statutory lease of a Government plot under the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act and Rules is treated as binding according to its own terms, and forfeiture or re-entry cannot be expanded beyond the lease clauses. The text also states that using part of the premises for banking business breaches a covenant restricting use to residence, even if only a portion is commercialised. It further emphasises that where change of user or regularisation requires approval by a named competent authority, any forfeiture or re-entry decision must reflect independent consideration and fair application of mind; a decision taken without that process is invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2020 17:28:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (12) TMI 338 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289436</link>
      <description>A statutory lease of a Government plot under the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act and Rules is treated as binding according to its own terms, and forfeiture or re-entry cannot be expanded beyond the lease clauses. The text also states that using part of the premises for banking business breaches a covenant restricting use to residence, even if only a portion is commercialised. It further emphasises that where change of user or regularisation requires approval by a named competent authority, any forfeiture or re-entry decision must reflect independent consideration and fair application of mind; a decision taken without that process is invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>