https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397001 The Court allowed the petitioner's challenge against the National Anti-Profiteering Authority's order, finding the proceedings jurisdictionally flawed due to a time-barred second complaint not disclosed to the petitioner. The Court directed the petitioner to deposit the principal profiteered sum within two weeks, staying interest and penalty proceedings. The matter was scheduled for further hearing, with instructions for order dissemination and compliance. en-us Tue, 28 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Mar 2025 16:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397001 The Court allowed the petitioner's challenge against the National Anti-Profiteering Authority's order, finding the proceedings jurisdictionally flawed due to a time-barred second complaint not disclosed to the petitioner. The Court directed the petitioner to deposit the principal profiteered sum within two weeks, staying interest and penalty proceedings. The matter was scheduled for further hearing, with instructions for order dissemination and compliance. Case-Laws GST Tue, 28 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397001