<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Upholds Relief for Assessee, Dismisses Re-imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54195</link>
    <description>Penalty levied u/s 271(I)(c) - Whether &quot;Mens rea&quot; is apparent in this case? - where the two regular appellate authorities have granted the relief to the Assessee by deleting the penalty imposed by the Assessing Authority u/s 271(1)(c), we don&#039;t think that it is a fit case for re-imposition thereof, by allowing the appeal of the Department - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2020 15:04:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2020 15:04:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Upholds Relief for Assessee, Dismisses Re-imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54195</link>
      <description>Penalty levied u/s 271(I)(c) - Whether &quot;Mens rea&quot; is apparent in this case? - where the two regular appellate authorities have granted the relief to the Assessee by deleting the penalty imposed by the Assessing Authority u/s 271(1)(c), we don&#039;t think that it is a fit case for re-imposition thereof, by allowing the appeal of the Department - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2020 15:04:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>