<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (7) TMI 35 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22864</link>
    <description>Refund arising from appellate orders that had attained finality had to be issued as a consequential obligation under the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 240 required the Income-tax Officer to refund amounts due as a result of such orders, and section 244(1) made interest payable where the refund was not granted within the prescribed period. On that basis, the assessee was entitled in law to refund vouchers and admissible interest, with no legal impediment shown against their issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:49:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (7) TMI 35 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22864</link>
      <description>Refund arising from appellate orders that had attained finality had to be issued as a consequential obligation under the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 240 required the Income-tax Officer to refund amounts due as a result of such orders, and section 244(1) made interest payable where the refund was not granted within the prescribed period. On that basis, the assessee was entitled in law to refund vouchers and admissible interest, with no legal impediment shown against their issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>