<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 660 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396991</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by deleting Transfer Pricing adjustments for the relevant assessment years, directing the AO to compute interest and grant TDS credit as per law. The Tribunal upheld the consistent application of the TNMM method, emphasizing the rule of consistency in tax assessments. Penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) were not elaborated upon in the judgment. The addition of interest income on fixed deposits for one year was upheld, with relief granted for excess income in another year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:05:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 660 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396991</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by deleting Transfer Pricing adjustments for the relevant assessment years, directing the AO to compute interest and grant TDS credit as per law. The Tribunal upheld the consistent application of the TNMM method, emphasizing the rule of consistency in tax assessments. Penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) were not elaborated upon in the judgment. The addition of interest income on fixed deposits for one year was upheld, with relief granted for excess income in another year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>