<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (12) TMI 71 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22863</link>
    <description>Sales tax subsidy granted under a State scheme for specified industrial units in backward areas was treated as an incentive for capital investment, not as an addition to trading profits, and therefore as a capital receipt not assessable as income. On that settled legal position, the High Court held that no useful purpose would be served by seeking a reference under section 256 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and rejected the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:48:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (12) TMI 71 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22863</link>
      <description>Sales tax subsidy granted under a State scheme for specified industrial units in backward areas was treated as an incentive for capital investment, not as an addition to trading profits, and therefore as a capital receipt not assessable as income. On that settled legal position, the High Court held that no useful purpose would be served by seeking a reference under section 256 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and rejected the application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>