https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289406 The Bombay HC held that whether the document created a lease or a leave and licence depended on the parties' intention as gathered from the document and surrounding circumstances. Monthly rent terminology, fixed payment dates, advance payment, renewal for eleven months, landlord-tenant language, and business use all indicated an intended interest in the premises rather than a genuine licence. The occupant was therefore treated as a tenant protected by rent law, and supervisory interference under Article 227 was unwarranted because the lower finding was a possible view. en-us Thu, 08 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Jul 2020 13:22:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289406 The Bombay HC held that whether the document created a lease or a leave and licence depended on the parties' intention as gathered from the document and surrounding circumstances. Monthly rent terminology, fixed payment dates, advance payment, renewal for eleven months, landlord-tenant language, and business use all indicated an intended interest in the premises rather than a genuine licence. The occupant was therefore treated as a tenant protected by rent law, and supervisory interference under Article 227 was unwarranted because the lower finding was a possible view. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289406