<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1768 - DELHI HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289403</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding disallowance under Section 14A(2) as the Assessing Officer did not record prima facie satisfaction that the claim of the assessee was inadmissible, as required by Rule 8D. The ITAT&#039;s conclusions were justified, and no substantial question of law arose. Appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:16:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1768 - DELHI HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289403</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding disallowance under Section 14A(2) as the Assessing Officer did not record prima facie satisfaction that the claim of the assessee was inadmissible, as required by Rule 8D. The ITAT&#039;s conclusions were justified, and no substantial question of law arose. Appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>