<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (3) TMI 176 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289400</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the seizure of 59 wristwatches and the show cause notice. The officer had a reasonable belief that the goods were smuggled, and the notice was found to be valid despite being issued by an Assistant Collector. The court determined that the notice was not vague and dismissed the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:58:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (3) TMI 176 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289400</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the seizure of 59 wristwatches and the show cause notice. The officer had a reasonable belief that the goods were smuggled, and the notice was found to be valid despite being issued by an Assistant Collector. The court determined that the notice was not vague and dismissed the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>