<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (10) TMI 58 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22861</link>
    <description>The court upheld the convictions of A-2 and A-3 under sections 276C and 277 of the Income-tax Act, with A-2 sentenced to pay fines and undergo imprisonment till the rising of the court. The Income-tax Department&#039;s appeal for sentence enhancement was dismissed as the lower court&#039;s reasons for the sentence were deemed appropriate. The court found the evidence presented by the prosecution, including secret account books, to be valid. A-2&#039;s responsibility as the managing partner of the firm was affirmed, and intentional income suppression was established, leading to the dismissal of appeals and affirmation of convictions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:44:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (10) TMI 58 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22861</link>
      <description>The court upheld the convictions of A-2 and A-3 under sections 276C and 277 of the Income-tax Act, with A-2 sentenced to pay fines and undergo imprisonment till the rising of the court. The Income-tax Department&#039;s appeal for sentence enhancement was dismissed as the lower court&#039;s reasons for the sentence were deemed appropriate. The court found the evidence presented by the prosecution, including secret account books, to be valid. A-2&#039;s responsibility as the managing partner of the firm was affirmed, and intentional income suppression was established, leading to the dismissal of appeals and affirmation of convictions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>