<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 647 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396978</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the Block Assessment Order dated 30.06.2003. It found that the order was within the limitation period as the search was continuous until 12.06.2001, the notice under Section 143(2) was validly issued and served, the Block Assessment Order had the required prior approval under Section 158BG, and there was no violation of principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:17:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 647 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396978</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the Block Assessment Order dated 30.06.2003. It found that the order was within the limitation period as the search was continuous until 12.06.2001, the notice under Section 143(2) was validly issued and served, the Block Assessment Order had the required prior approval under Section 158BG, and there was no violation of principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>