https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396970 The High Court refrained from delving into the merits of the case but directed the respondent to decide on the application for provisional release of seized gold in accordance with the law. Emphasizing the importance of a fair hearing for both parties, the Court mandated a decision within a month, highlighting the significance of due process and fair consideration in matters of seizure and release of goods, especially when livelihoods are impacted. This balanced approach aims to efficiently resolve the issue while upholding principles of justice and procedural fairness. en-us Wed, 01 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jul 2020 14:31:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396970 The High Court refrained from delving into the merits of the case but directed the respondent to decide on the application for provisional release of seized gold in accordance with the law. Emphasizing the importance of a fair hearing for both parties, the Court mandated a decision within a month, highlighting the significance of due process and fair consideration in matters of seizure and release of goods, especially when livelihoods are impacted. This balanced approach aims to efficiently resolve the issue while upholding principles of justice and procedural fairness. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 01 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396970