https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396967 The court quashed the inquiry report, penalty order, and appellate order, directing respondents to restore the petitioner's promotion and issue consequential orders. Writ petitions were allowed without costs. The court found procedural unfairness in not providing the inquiry report before imposing the penalty, leading to perverse findings. The cancellation of promotion was deemed a consequence of the penalty, not double jeopardy. The appellate order was set aside for lack of proper consideration of grounds raised by the petitioner. en-us Fri, 24 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jul 2020 14:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396967 The court quashed the inquiry report, penalty order, and appellate order, directing respondents to restore the petitioner's promotion and issue consequential orders. Writ petitions were allowed without costs. The court found procedural unfairness in not providing the inquiry report before imposing the penalty, leading to perverse findings. The cancellation of promotion was deemed a consequence of the penalty, not double jeopardy. The appellate order was set aside for lack of proper consideration of grounds raised by the petitioner. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396967