<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 404 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289381</link>
    <description>Where a service rule prescribes withholding of increments or debarment from promotion as separate penalties, the disciplinary authority cannot combine them into one punishment. The proposed composite penalty was held to exceed the scope of the rule and was therefore invalid. The matter was remitted to the competent executive authority to apply its own mind and pass fresh final orders in accordance with law, after which consequential reinstatement was to follow.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:40:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 404 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289381</link>
      <description>Where a service rule prescribes withholding of increments or debarment from promotion as separate penalties, the disciplinary authority cannot combine them into one punishment. The proposed composite penalty was held to exceed the scope of the rule and was therefore invalid. The matter was remitted to the competent executive authority to apply its own mind and pass fresh final orders in accordance with law, after which consequential reinstatement was to follow.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>