<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 404 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289381</link>
    <description>The court held that withholding increments and promotions simultaneously is not permissible under the relevant rules. The District Council was directed to refer the matter to the Executive Committee for final orders within a specified time frame, ensuring compliance with the law. The petitioner, a Forest Officer, was to be reinstated following the Executive Committee&#039;s decision. The petition was disposed of without costs being awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:40:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 404 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289381</link>
      <description>The court held that withholding increments and promotions simultaneously is not permissible under the relevant rules. The District Council was directed to refer the matter to the Executive Committee for final orders within a specified time frame, ensuring compliance with the law. The petitioner, a Forest Officer, was to be reinstated following the Executive Committee&#039;s decision. The petition was disposed of without costs being awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>