https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289380 The High Court allowed the petition challenging the appellate order in a service removal case under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court found the appellate authority failed to comply with Rule 27 of the Central Civil Service (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1965, by not adequately assessing procedural compliance, evidentiary support, and the adequacy of the penalty imposed. The court quashed the appellate order for lacking proper reasoning and directed the appellate authority to reconsider the appeal, emphasizing the importance of procedural adherence and thorough review within a specified timeframe. en-us Tue, 10 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:33:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289380 The High Court allowed the petition challenging the appellate order in a service removal case under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court found the appellate authority failed to comply with Rule 27 of the Central Civil Service (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1965, by not adequately assessing procedural compliance, evidentiary support, and the adequacy of the penalty imposed. The court quashed the appellate order for lacking proper reasoning and directed the appellate authority to reconsider the appeal, emphasizing the importance of procedural adherence and thorough review within a specified timeframe. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289380