<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (8) TMI 226 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289380</link>
    <description>The Gauhati HC held that an appellate authority under departmental service rules must independently examine procedural compliance, the evidentiary basis of the disciplinary findings, and the proportionality of the penalty, as well as the grounds raised in appeal. An order that merely states there is no reason to interfere, without addressing the statutory factors or the memorandum of appeal, amounts to mechanical disposal and fails the appellate duty imposed by the rules. The impugned appellate order was therefore unsustainable in law and was quashed, with a direction to decide the appeal afresh in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:33:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (8) TMI 226 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289380</link>
      <description>The Gauhati HC held that an appellate authority under departmental service rules must independently examine procedural compliance, the evidentiary basis of the disciplinary findings, and the proportionality of the penalty, as well as the grounds raised in appeal. An order that merely states there is no reason to interfere, without addressing the statutory factors or the memorandum of appeal, amounts to mechanical disposal and fails the appellate duty imposed by the rules. The impugned appellate order was therefore unsustainable in law and was quashed, with a direction to decide the appeal afresh in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>