https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289379 At the Section 482 CrPC stage, a court cannot test the truth or sufficiency of evidence and must ask only whether the complaint, on its face, discloses the essential ingredients of the alleged offences. Where the complaint specifically alleged a subsisting marriage, a later religious ceremony, threats, and related conduct, the matter disclosed issues requiring trial. The High Court erred by pre-judging evidentiary sufficiency and quashing the complaint at threshold. The complaint was restored for trial, and the trial court was directed to decide the case independently on its own merits. en-us Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:14:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289379 At the Section 482 CrPC stage, a court cannot test the truth or sufficiency of evidence and must ask only whether the complaint, on its face, discloses the essential ingredients of the alleged offences. Where the complaint specifically alleged a subsisting marriage, a later religious ceremony, threats, and related conduct, the matter disclosed issues requiring trial. The High Court erred by pre-judging evidentiary sufficiency and quashing the complaint at threshold. The complaint was restored for trial, and the trial court was directed to decide the case independently on its own merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289379