https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289353 The appeal was allowed, and the judgment of the Subordinate Judge was restored. The decision concluded that there was no valid dedication of the Chegondapalli mortgage by any act inter vivos, thus aligning with the Subordinate Judge's original view. The detailed analysis of the accounts and evidence led to this conclusion, emphasizing the importance of clear appropriation and the necessity of inter vivos acts for valid charitable dedications under Hindu law. en-us Tue, 22 Feb 1927 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jul 2020 15:01:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289353 The appeal was allowed, and the judgment of the Subordinate Judge was restored. The decision concluded that there was no valid dedication of the Chegondapalli mortgage by any act inter vivos, thus aligning with the Subordinate Judge's original view. The detailed analysis of the accounts and evidence led to this conclusion, emphasizing the importance of clear appropriation and the necessity of inter vivos acts for valid charitable dedications under Hindu law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Feb 1927 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289353