<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (10) TMI 52 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22849</link>
    <description>The High Court determined that a loss claimed by an assessee, related to a payment made to settle goods not supplied, was a business loss rather than a speculation loss. The Court criticized the Tribunal for dismissing the claim without addressing initial reasons provided by lower authorities. Despite lower authorities not mentioning the speculative nature of the transaction, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee based on contractual terms and lack of concrete evidence supporting speculation. The decision favored the assessee, concluding the payment was a business loss, leading to a verdict against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:24:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (10) TMI 52 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22849</link>
      <description>The High Court determined that a loss claimed by an assessee, related to a payment made to settle goods not supplied, was a business loss rather than a speculation loss. The Court criticized the Tribunal for dismissing the claim without addressing initial reasons provided by lower authorities. Despite lower authorities not mentioning the speculative nature of the transaction, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee based on contractual terms and lack of concrete evidence supporting speculation. The decision favored the assessee, concluding the payment was a business loss, leading to a verdict against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>