<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 622 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396953</link>
    <description>In a leave and licence arrangement, a disproportionately large interest-free security deposit was treated as part of the rental structure, so notional interest on the deposit was considered taxable as income from house property; the rate was aligned with the earlier year at 9%. Interest expenditure claimed against income from other sources was disallowed because no direct nexus with the earning of that income was established. Objections based on natural justice and alleged conjectural findings were rejected as the appellate record showed reasonable opportunity and reasoned findings. The additional ground on set-off of business loss against income under other heads was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh verification and decision after hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 14:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 622 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396953</link>
      <description>In a leave and licence arrangement, a disproportionately large interest-free security deposit was treated as part of the rental structure, so notional interest on the deposit was considered taxable as income from house property; the rate was aligned with the earlier year at 9%. Interest expenditure claimed against income from other sources was disallowed because no direct nexus with the earning of that income was established. Objections based on natural justice and alleged conjectural findings were rejected as the appellate record showed reasonable opportunity and reasoned findings. The additional ground on set-off of business loss against income under other heads was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh verification and decision after hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>