<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 619 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396950</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to delete the additions of Rs. 1.38 crores and the disallowance of Rs. 13,83,200 in interest payments. It emphasized that the assessee discharged its initial burden of proof and that non-response to notices does not automatically render transactions non-genuine. The judgment highlights the necessity of evaluating the totality of evidence rather than relying solely on procedural non-compliance by third parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 14:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 619 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396950</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to delete the additions of Rs. 1.38 crores and the disallowance of Rs. 13,83,200 in interest payments. It emphasized that the assessee discharged its initial burden of proof and that non-response to notices does not automatically render transactions non-genuine. The judgment highlights the necessity of evaluating the totality of evidence rather than relying solely on procedural non-compliance by third parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>