<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 1006 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289346</link>
    <description>The High Court clarified that separate regimes exist for Sections 10A and 10B of the Income Tax Act, rejecting the claim for benefits under Section 10B based on Section 10A approval. The Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider the applicant&#039;s entitlement under Section 10A, instructing a review of relevant documents. The previous judgment was modified, and the Tribunal was tasked with issuing new orders after hearing both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 1006 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289346</link>
      <description>The High Court clarified that separate regimes exist for Sections 10A and 10B of the Income Tax Act, rejecting the claim for benefits under Section 10B based on Section 10A approval. The Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider the applicant&#039;s entitlement under Section 10A, instructing a review of relevant documents. The previous judgment was modified, and the Tribunal was tasked with issuing new orders after hearing both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>