<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (10) TMI 51 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22844</link>
    <description>A firm was found entitled to registration where a minor had been admitted to the benefits of partnership and the materials on record showed valid guardian consent. The partnership deed stated that the minor&#039;s father and guardian was not to interfere in the conduct of business, and the father&#039;s affidavit confirmed that consent had been given for the minor&#039;s admission. The Tribunal treated these documents as sufficient proof of consent, and no adverse finding was made that the firm was not genuine. The incidental reference to transfer of money to the minor was not treated as a ground to deny registration, and the question was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:05:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (10) TMI 51 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22844</link>
      <description>A firm was found entitled to registration where a minor had been admitted to the benefits of partnership and the materials on record showed valid guardian consent. The partnership deed stated that the minor&#039;s father and guardian was not to interfere in the conduct of business, and the father&#039;s affidavit confirmed that consent had been given for the minor&#039;s admission. The Tribunal treated these documents as sufficient proof of consent, and no adverse finding was made that the firm was not genuine. The incidental reference to transfer of money to the minor was not treated as a ground to deny registration, and the question was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>