<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 1204 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289342</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order to delete the disallowance of the provision for approved gratuity funds. The decision emphasized that section 40A(7) takes precedence over section 43B, aligning with previous judgments and the specific provisions of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 1204 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289342</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order to delete the disallowance of the provision for approved gratuity funds. The decision emphasized that section 40A(7) takes precedence over section 43B, aligning with previous judgments and the specific provisions of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>