https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396946 Regular bail was found justified where investigation qua the accused had concluded, the allegations were largely documentary, and no compelling necessity for continued custody was shown. The court considered that pre-trial detention cannot be sustained merely on the seriousness of the accusations when there is no real need for further investigation, no demonstrated risk of abscondence or interference with evidence, and parity favours release because similarly placed co-accused had already been granted bail. The applicant's alleged non-cooperation was assessed against the record, including prior bail orders and production of documents, and continued judicial custody was held unjustified. en-us Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 26 Jul 2020 12:19:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396946 Regular bail was found justified where investigation qua the accused had concluded, the allegations were largely documentary, and no compelling necessity for continued custody was shown. The court considered that pre-trial detention cannot be sustained merely on the seriousness of the accusations when there is no real need for further investigation, no demonstrated risk of abscondence or interference with evidence, and parity favours release because similarly placed co-accused had already been granted bail. The applicant's alleged non-cooperation was assessed against the record, including prior bail orders and production of documents, and continued judicial custody was held unjustified. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396946