https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289337 Delhi HC held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 could be exercised because part of the cause of action arose in Delhi: the reference was made there, the award was published there, the undertaking had substantial operations there, and enforceability lay through the Central Government in Delhi. On merits, the industrial award granting dearness allowance was not quashed, as the employer did not establish a legally material inability to bear the burden and the allowance had already been paid at a higher rate. The challenge to the award was therefore rejected. en-us Tue, 31 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Jul 2020 12:39:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289337 Delhi HC held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 could be exercised because part of the cause of action arose in Delhi: the reference was made there, the award was published there, the undertaking had substantial operations there, and enforceability lay through the Central Government in Delhi. On merits, the industrial award granting dearness allowance was not quashed, as the employer did not establish a legally material inability to bear the burden and the allowance had already been paid at a higher rate. The challenge to the award was therefore rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 31 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289337