https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289334 Territorial jurisdiction depended on where the cause of action arose, not on the place where the goods were intended to be ultimately despatched. The suit concerned alleged loss and pilferage of railway goods while lying in a godown at Kudra, and the actionable events occurred there. For jurisdiction, the relevant inquiry was whether any part of the cause of action arose within the Patna court's limits; the mere intention to send the goods to Patna Ghat was insufficient. The Patna court therefore lacked territorial jurisdiction, and the application was dismissed. en-us Mon, 06 Jan 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Jul 2020 12:14:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289334 Territorial jurisdiction depended on where the cause of action arose, not on the place where the goods were intended to be ultimately despatched. The suit concerned alleged loss and pilferage of railway goods while lying in a godown at Kudra, and the actionable events occurred there. For jurisdiction, the relevant inquiry was whether any part of the cause of action arose within the Patna court's limits; the mere intention to send the goods to Patna Ghat was insufficient. The Patna court therefore lacked territorial jurisdiction, and the application was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Jan 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289334