<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 614 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396945</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the constitutionality and legality of the National Anti-Profiteering Authority and related provisions challenged by the petitioner. Despite objections, the Court directed the petitioner to deposit the principal profiteered sum and allowed payment in six monthly instalments due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Interest and penalty proceedings were stayed, and parties were instructed to submit written arguments before the next hearing on 24th August 2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 614 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396945</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the constitutionality and legality of the National Anti-Profiteering Authority and related provisions challenged by the petitioner. Despite objections, the Court directed the petitioner to deposit the principal profiteered sum and allowed payment in six monthly instalments due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Interest and penalty proceedings were stayed, and parties were instructed to submit written arguments before the next hearing on 24th August 2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>