https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396944 The Court directed the respondent to process the manual refund application within three working days, reducing the refund claim and sanctioning the balance amount. Compliance with the High Court order was confirmed, and the redundant manual application was returned. The respondent developed functionality for filing refund applications by clubbing financial years. The petitioner's grievance over the sanctioning order was noted as appealable, leading to the disposal of the writ petition and pending applications. The judgment provided a comprehensive resolution to the legal dispute, addressing various issues related to refund processing and compliance. en-us Thu, 23 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Jul 2020 11:05:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396944 The Court directed the respondent to process the manual refund application within three working days, reducing the refund claim and sanctioning the balance amount. Compliance with the High Court order was confirmed, and the redundant manual application was returned. The respondent developed functionality for filing refund applications by clubbing financial years. The petitioner's grievance over the sanctioning order was noted as appealable, leading to the disposal of the writ petition and pending applications. The judgment provided a comprehensive resolution to the legal dispute, addressing various issues related to refund processing and compliance. Case-Laws GST Thu, 23 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396944