<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 611 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396942</link>
    <description>The refund mechanism under the Delhi Goods and Services Tax Act and Rules operates as a complete code. Where the proper officer does not, within the prescribed fifteen days, issue an acknowledgement or communicate deficiencies in FORM GST RFD-03, the refund application is treated as complete and the department loses the right to raise a belated deficiency memo. Delay in processing the refund then attracts the statutory consequence under Section 56, and a hyper-technical objection cannot defeat the claim where supporting documents are already on record and their authenticity is undisputed. The refund was therefore to be processed and released with statutory interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 17:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 611 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396942</link>
      <description>The refund mechanism under the Delhi Goods and Services Tax Act and Rules operates as a complete code. Where the proper officer does not, within the prescribed fifteen days, issue an acknowledgement or communicate deficiencies in FORM GST RFD-03, the refund application is treated as complete and the department loses the right to raise a belated deficiency memo. Delay in processing the refund then attracts the statutory consequence under Section 56, and a hyper-technical objection cannot defeat the claim where supporting documents are already on record and their authenticity is undisputed. The refund was therefore to be processed and released with statutory interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>