https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289328 A land acquisition notification describing industrial development at Asansol was treated as sufficiently clear, since the law does not require the proposed projects or industries to be named in detail, and no prejudice from the Section 5A process was shown. But where the acquisition is specifically alleged to be a colourable exercise of power masking a private purpose, the State must fairly disclose the relevant material and answer the challenge directly; if it does not, the acquisition may not be sustained despite the usual finality attached to a declaration of public purpose. en-us Fri, 17 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Jul 2020 10:40:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289328 A land acquisition notification describing industrial development at Asansol was treated as sufficiently clear, since the law does not require the proposed projects or industries to be named in detail, and no prejudice from the Section 5A process was shown. But where the acquisition is specifically alleged to be a colourable exercise of power masking a private purpose, the State must fairly disclose the relevant material and answer the challenge directly; if it does not, the acquisition may not be sustained despite the usual finality attached to a declaration of public purpose. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 17 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289328