https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396931 The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal and affirmed the CIT(A)'s decision to restrict the addition to 12.5% of alleged bogus purchases by the assessee. The Tribunal found that the assessing officer failed to adequately verify the distribution of diaries and that the evidence provided by the assessee was considered appropriately by the CIT(A). The order was pronounced on 21/07/2020. en-us Tue, 21 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396931 The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal and affirmed the CIT(A)'s decision to restrict the addition to 12.5% of alleged bogus purchases by the assessee. The Tribunal found that the assessing officer failed to adequately verify the distribution of diaries and that the evidence provided by the assessee was considered appropriately by the CIT(A). The order was pronounced on 21/07/2020. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 21 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396931