<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 599 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396930</link>
    <description>Business support charges recovered on a cost-to-cost basis without mark-up were treated as reimbursement of expenses and not taxable as royalty or fees for technical services. The Tribunal held that acting as a central coordinator for group entities, including arranging insurance, IT support, procurement-related services, BPO processing and administrative inputs, did not amount to rendering managerial, technical or consultancy services. It applied the principle that a coordinated support or facility arrangement, without making technical knowledge available or involving a profit element, falls outside royalty and fees for technical services. The low-end BPO and procurement activities were therefore characterised as commercial coordinating functions, and the receipts were held not taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2020 10:16:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 599 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396930</link>
      <description>Business support charges recovered on a cost-to-cost basis without mark-up were treated as reimbursement of expenses and not taxable as royalty or fees for technical services. The Tribunal held that acting as a central coordinator for group entities, including arranging insurance, IT support, procurement-related services, BPO processing and administrative inputs, did not amount to rendering managerial, technical or consultancy services. It applied the principle that a coordinated support or facility arrangement, without making technical knowledge available or involving a profit element, falls outside royalty and fees for technical services. The low-end BPO and procurement activities were therefore characterised as commercial coordinating functions, and the receipts were held not taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>