<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 1112 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289326</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s order and set aside the CIT&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, determining that belated TDS payments made before the due date of filing the return are not subject to disallowance under section 40(a)(ia). The Tribunal relied on the decision of the Calcutta High Court, emphasizing its retrospective operation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2020 10:04:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 1112 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289326</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s order and set aside the CIT&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, determining that belated TDS payments made before the due date of filing the return are not subject to disallowance under section 40(a)(ia). The Tribunal relied on the decision of the Calcutta High Court, emphasizing its retrospective operation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>