<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (10) TMI 49 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22837</link>
    <description>The court addressed the interpretation of extra shift allowance, depreciation calculation on machinery, and a conflict between a Full Bench decision and a circular by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. The court upheld that the extra shift allowance should be based on the actual days worked, in accordance with statutory provisions, ruling in favor of the Revenue against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:04:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (10) TMI 49 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22837</link>
      <description>The court addressed the interpretation of extra shift allowance, depreciation calculation on machinery, and a conflict between a Full Bench decision and a circular by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. The court upheld that the extra shift allowance should be based on the actual days worked, in accordance with statutory provisions, ruling in favor of the Revenue against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>