https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396911 Bail was granted under Section 439 CrPC where the allegations concerned questionable loan transactions, but the court found the material to be largely documentary and already in the record of the company and allied entities. The petitioner had left executive control years earlier, had resigned from the company, and the record did not show any cogent monetary gain, present access to evidence, or real risk of absconding or tampering with evidence. In the absence of misuse of interim bail and given the limited role attributed to him, the bail petition was allowed subject to conditions. en-us Wed, 17 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Jul 2020 08:08:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396911 Bail was granted under Section 439 CrPC where the allegations concerned questionable loan transactions, but the court found the material to be largely documentary and already in the record of the company and allied entities. The petitioner had left executive control years earlier, had resigned from the company, and the record did not show any cogent monetary gain, present access to evidence, or real risk of absconding or tampering with evidence. In the absence of misuse of interim bail and given the limited role attributed to him, the bail petition was allowed subject to conditions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396911