https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289310 An accrued right to execute a decree within the limitation period under the repealed Indian Limitation Act, 1908 survived the Limitation Act, 1963 because repeal does not retrospectively extinguish vested rights absent clear contrary intent. Applying Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, the Court held that the execution petition had to be tested under the 1908 Act, not the 1963 Act. On that basis, the petition was within time, and the injunction period was also excludable under the old Act. The limitation objection therefore failed. en-us Mon, 25 Oct 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:56:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289310 An accrued right to execute a decree within the limitation period under the repealed Indian Limitation Act, 1908 survived the Limitation Act, 1963 because repeal does not retrospectively extinguish vested rights absent clear contrary intent. Applying Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, the Court held that the execution petition had to be tested under the 1908 Act, not the 1963 Act. On that basis, the petition was within time, and the injunction period was also excludable under the old Act. The limitation objection therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 25 Oct 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289310