https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396910 The High Court directed the petitioner to settle the balance dues of Rs. 83,58,962 within 6 months, with the first respondent having the right to pursue legal remedies if the payment is not made within the specified period. The Court acknowledged the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the petitioner's ability to meet immediate obligations, releasing the frozen bank account based on the petitioner's commitment to pay. The decision aimed to strike a fair balance between the parties' interests, emphasizing the importance of fulfilling commitments while recognizing the challenges faced during the pandemic. en-us Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Mar 2025 17:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396910 The High Court directed the petitioner to settle the balance dues of Rs. 83,58,962 within 6 months, with the first respondent having the right to pursue legal remedies if the payment is not made within the specified period. The Court acknowledged the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the petitioner's ability to meet immediate obligations, releasing the frozen bank account based on the petitioner's commitment to pay. The decision aimed to strike a fair balance between the parties' interests, emphasizing the importance of fulfilling commitments while recognizing the challenges faced during the pandemic. Case-Laws GST Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396910