<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 576 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396907</link>
    <description>The court set aside the cancellation order of registration under the CGST Act, 2017, as it failed to consider the petitioner&#039;s response to the show cause notice. The court found the order invalid due to the non-consideration of the reply, leading to the allowance of the writ petition. The respondent was granted the liberty to initiate proceedings again if required, following the law. The connected miscellaneous petition was closed without costs for either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 576 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396907</link>
      <description>The court set aside the cancellation order of registration under the CGST Act, 2017, as it failed to consider the petitioner&#039;s response to the show cause notice. The court found the order invalid due to the non-consideration of the reply, leading to the allowance of the writ petition. The respondent was granted the liberty to initiate proceedings again if required, following the law. The connected miscellaneous petition was closed without costs for either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>