<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 568 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396899</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings as they were based on a mere change of opinion, lacking new tangible material. The disallowance of sales promotion expenses was deleted as the expenses were not prohibited by law. The addition for alleged concealed sales was partly allowed, with the disallowance restricted to the cost of excess raw material wastage. The claim for Section 80IB exemption on increased business income due to additions was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 15:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 568 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396899</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings as they were based on a mere change of opinion, lacking new tangible material. The disallowance of sales promotion expenses was deleted as the expenses were not prohibited by law. The addition for alleged concealed sales was partly allowed, with the disallowance restricted to the cost of excess raw material wastage. The claim for Section 80IB exemption on increased business income due to additions was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>