https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396892 A distinct application seeking modification of an interim injunction could not be disposed of without independent reasons; the tribunal had not separately examined the requested alteration of the interim arrangement, so that order was set aside and remitted for fresh consideration by a reasoned order. In contrast, the refusal to implead subsequent purchasers was sustained because the order did not finally adjudicate their rights on merits, and no ground for interference was shown. The text notes that a separate substantive grievance requires a reasoned adjudication, while non-final orders may not justify appellate interference. en-us Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jul 2020 08:47:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396892 A distinct application seeking modification of an interim injunction could not be disposed of without independent reasons; the tribunal had not separately examined the requested alteration of the interim arrangement, so that order was set aside and remitted for fresh consideration by a reasoned order. In contrast, the refusal to implead subsequent purchasers was sustained because the order did not finally adjudicate their rights on merits, and no ground for interference was shown. The text notes that a separate substantive grievance requires a reasoned adjudication, while non-final orders may not justify appellate interference. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396892