<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 558 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396889</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to dismiss the Application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appeal, filed by a Financial Creditor, was based on a loan agreement with the Respondent, but the Adjudicating Authority determined it to be a Builder Buyer arrangement instead. The Tribunal found no charge created on the security flats and emphasized the need for Corporate Debtor resolution. Despite claims of a settlement agreement, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, concluding that the existing agreements and transactions did not support the Application under Section 7.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2020 08:31:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 558 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396889</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to dismiss the Application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appeal, filed by a Financial Creditor, was based on a loan agreement with the Respondent, but the Adjudicating Authority determined it to be a Builder Buyer arrangement instead. The Tribunal found no charge created on the security flats and emphasized the need for Corporate Debtor resolution. Despite claims of a settlement agreement, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, concluding that the existing agreements and transactions did not support the Application under Section 7.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>