<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 556 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396887</link>
    <description>In a PMLA prosecution, regular bail was granted where investigation was complete, the complaint had been filed, and the material was largely documentary and already secured; continued custody was not shown to be necessary, and there was no real risk of absconding, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses. The seriousness of the economic allegations alone was held insufficient to justify further incarceration once the relevant records were seized and the defence could be prejudiced by prolonged pre-trial detention. The twin conditions for bail were not treated as a bar, and bail was assessed on settled criminal law factors and fair-trial considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2020 08:21:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 556 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396887</link>
      <description>In a PMLA prosecution, regular bail was granted where investigation was complete, the complaint had been filed, and the material was largely documentary and already secured; continued custody was not shown to be necessary, and there was no real risk of absconding, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses. The seriousness of the economic allegations alone was held insufficient to justify further incarceration once the relevant records were seized and the defence could be prejudiced by prolonged pre-trial detention. The twin conditions for bail were not treated as a bar, and bail was assessed on settled criminal law factors and fair-trial considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>