https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396881 In allegations of large-scale siphoning of public funds, the Court declined regular bail because the seriousness of the economic offences, the continuing investigation, and the risk of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses weighed against release. Parity with a co-accused was rejected because the petitioner's role was found materially different and more substantial on the record before the Court. The liberty interest was therefore held not to outweigh the investigative concerns arising from the nature of the accusations, and bail was refused. en-us Thu, 23 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jul 2020 08:02:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396881 In allegations of large-scale siphoning of public funds, the Court declined regular bail because the seriousness of the economic offences, the continuing investigation, and the risk of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses weighed against release. Parity with a co-accused was rejected because the petitioner's role was found materially different and more substantial on the record before the Court. The liberty interest was therefore held not to outweigh the investigative concerns arising from the nature of the accusations, and bail was refused. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396881