<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1458 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289289</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were void ab initio due to lack of an independent belief by the Assessing Officer (AO) that income had escaped assessment. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the AO forming an independent opinion before reopening an assessment, citing legal precedents. As a result, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decision to cancel the reassessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2020 08:00:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1458 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289289</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were void ab initio due to lack of an independent belief by the Assessing Officer (AO) that income had escaped assessment. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the AO forming an independent opinion before reopening an assessment, citing legal precedents. As a result, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decision to cancel the reassessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>