https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289295 The appellant contested the penalty imposition, arguing that the excess amount deposited should cover the pre-deposit requirement. The appellant paid the differential Central Excise duty with interest before the show cause notice, contending no separate intimation was needed for goods removal to related persons. The Tribunal found no evidence of evasion, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal. Compliance with pre-deposit, timely duty payments, and proper intimation were emphasized, stressing accurate record-keeping and transparency to avoid penalties. en-us Wed, 14 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jul 2020 08:00:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289295 The appellant contested the penalty imposition, arguing that the excess amount deposited should cover the pre-deposit requirement. The appellant paid the differential Central Excise duty with interest before the show cause notice, contending no separate intimation was needed for goods removal to related persons. The Tribunal found no evidence of evasion, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal. Compliance with pre-deposit, timely duty payments, and proper intimation were emphasized, stressing accurate record-keeping and transparency to avoid penalties. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 14 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289295