https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289280 The court emphasized compliance with the Companies Act, 1956, directing a strict inquiry process aligned with statutory provisions. It clarified that objections during the inquiry were permissible. Regarding the interpretation of Section 16 of Section 213 of the Companies Act, 2013, the court agreed that investigations should continue under the 1956 Act. Respondent Nos.1 to 4 were instructed to clarify their actions under the 2013 Act within two weeks. A stay on coercive steps was ordered pending clarification, with a further hearing scheduled for compliance review. en-us Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289280 The court emphasized compliance with the Companies Act, 1956, directing a strict inquiry process aligned with statutory provisions. It clarified that objections during the inquiry were permissible. Regarding the interpretation of Section 16 of Section 213 of the Companies Act, 2013, the court agreed that investigations should continue under the 1956 Act. Respondent Nos.1 to 4 were instructed to clarify their actions under the 2013 Act within two weeks. A stay on coercive steps was ordered pending clarification, with a further hearing scheduled for compliance review. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289280