https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289282 Section 100 CPC requires the High Court in second appeal to identify and hear the matter on substantial questions of law at admission, and departure from that mandatory procedure renders the appellate process unsustainable. In a suit for specific performance, Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act is satisfied when the pleadings and conduct show continuous readiness and willingness in substance; exact statutory wording is not essential. On the record, the plaintiffs' notices, replies, tender of consideration, and pursuit of performance showed such readiness and willingness, so denial of specific performance on that ground was not justified. The concurrent decree in favour of specific performance was restored. en-us Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jul 2020 17:08:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289282 Section 100 CPC requires the High Court in second appeal to identify and hear the matter on substantial questions of law at admission, and departure from that mandatory procedure renders the appellate process unsustainable. In a suit for specific performance, Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act is satisfied when the pleadings and conduct show continuous readiness and willingness in substance; exact statutory wording is not essential. On the record, the plaintiffs' notices, replies, tender of consideration, and pursuit of performance showed such readiness and willingness, so denial of specific performance on that ground was not justified. The concurrent decree in favour of specific performance was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289282