<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 549 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396880</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the rejection of a refund application under the CGST Act, 2017, directing the petitioner to pursue the appeal remedy before the Additional Commissioner, GST. The judgment emphasized the need to exhaust alternate efficacious remedies before approaching the High Court and provided specific directions for the appeal process before the Appellate Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 549 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396880</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the rejection of a refund application under the CGST Act, 2017, directing the petitioner to pursue the appeal remedy before the Additional Commissioner, GST. The judgment emphasized the need to exhaust alternate efficacious remedies before approaching the High Court and provided specific directions for the appeal process before the Appellate Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>